Summary
The lawsuit accuses DOGE of accessing highly sensitive personnel records without proper authorization, posing harmful professional consequences for federal workers. The suit also claims that DOGE's access could expose workers' financial data to hacking by criminals and foreign actors.
Key Points
DOGE allegedly obtained OPM records without undergoing normal national-security vetting.
The lawsuit seeks to cut off access to DOGE's agents and alleges violations of the Privacy Act.
Federal workers are at risk of having their financial data exposed to hacking by criminals and foreign actors due to DOGE's unauthorized access.
Why It Matters
This lawsuit highlights concerns about the government's ability to protect sensitive personnel records and raises questions about the potential consequences for federal workers.
Author
Charles Rollet