Summary
The article explores the evolution of climate tech names, from clean tech to planetary health. It discusses the need for a new term that captures the sector's essence and examines various alternatives, including frontier tech, deep tech, and growth tech.
Key Points
Climate tech has become too narrow, failing to capture the scope of companies working on sustainability.
Planetary health emerged as an early alternative but lacks clarity in its definition.
Frontier tech is another option, but it encompasses a broad range of technologies beyond climate change.
Why It Matters
The evolution of climate tech names matters because it reflects the sector's growth and the need for more accurate representation. A new term can help investors, policymakers, and consumers better understand the scope and impact of these companies.
Author
Tim De Chant