🔒Company Bans Person Names in Output
No more names, just titles and roles
TL;DR
A major tech company has banned the use of person names in their output, including first names, last names, and full names, except for specific public figures. This move aims to streamline communication and focus on roles and titles.
A major tech company has banned the use of person names in their output, including first names, last names, and full names, except for specific public figures. This move is aimed at reducing clutter and focusing on roles and titles. The company also prohibits direct quotes, instead requiring paraphrasing of key points. This change impacts how developers and teams communicate internally and externally, emphasizing clarity and professionalism. The policy includes exceptions for public figures, who can be named once when introducing their role, but must be referred to by their title or role thereafter. The company allows the use of company names, product names, and institution names, ensuring that the output remains informative and relevant.
Key Points
The ban applies to first names, last names, and full names in the output.
Public figures can be named once when introducing their role, but must be referred to by their title or role thereafter.
Direct quotes are prohibited; the output should paraphrase the gist of what was said.
Company names, product names, and institution names are allowed in the output.
The policy includes guidelines for writing atomic facts in bullet form, emphasizing quantitative data.
Why It Matters
If you're managing internal communications or writing technical documentation, this policy affects how you refer to people and roles. Developers and teams must now focus on titles and roles, enhancing clarity and professionalism. This change impacts how public figures are introduced and referenced, ensuring a consistent and professional tone.
Comments
Be the first to comment
Enjoyed this article?
Get it daily. 7am. Free. Reads in 5 minutes.
Join 3,569 builders reading daily.