🚨DOJ Indicts Comey for Instagram Threat Against Trump
Ex-FBI Chief Comey Faces New Charges Over Political Post
TL;DR
The US DOJ has indicted former FBI Director James Comey for allegedly threatening President Donald Trump via an Instagram post. The indictment centers around a deleted image showing numbers that could be interpreted as violent.
Yesterday, the US Department of Justice (DOJ) indicted James Comey on charges related to an alleged threat made toward President Donald Trump on Instagram. The case hinges on a now-deleted image Comey posted last May, which showed a seashell formation resembling '8647'. Attorney General Todd Blanche claims this represents a threat to get rid of or harm the president. This indictment is significant because it highlights how social media posts can be interpreted as threats in political contexts. The DOJ's action underscores the legal risks associated with ambiguous online statements, especially for high-profile individuals involved in politics. The image was posted and deleted on May 15th, 2025, after Comey realized some people might interpret '8647' as a violent message (with 'eighty-six' meaning to get rid of). The DOJ is charging Comey with threatening the president and transmitting a threat in interstate commerce. The case follows another indictment against Comey in September for allegedly lying to Congress. That charge was later dismissed by a judge.

Key Points
James Comey posted and deleted an image on May 15th showing numbers '8647' on Instagram
The DOJ claims the phrase 'eighty-six' in context means to get rid of or harm Trump
Attorney General Todd Blanche filed charges for threatening the president and interstate commerce threat
This follows a dismissed indictment from September over lying to Congress
Judge dismissed previous case, setting stage for new legal challenges
Why It Matters
The DOJ's latest action against James Comey underscores how social media posts can be legally interpreted as threats in political contexts. For those involved in politics or high-profile positions, ambiguous statements carry significant risks. This case highlights the need for caution when posting online.
Comments
Be the first to comment
Enjoyed this article?
Get it daily. 7am. Free. Reads in 5 minutes.
Join 3,483 builders reading daily.