Skip to content
theregister·

🚨IJ Publishes Database of 93 Cities Ending ALPR Contracts

93 Cities Say No to ALPR Surveillance

TL;DR

The Institute for Justice (IJ) released a database showing 93 cities terminating contracts for automated license plate readers (ALPRs), citing privacy concerns and misuse. The rate of cancellations has surged due to increased public awareness and legal challenges.

The Institute for Justice (IJ) published a database detailing 93 local governments that have terminated contracts for automated license plate readers (ALPRs), citing growing unease with warrantless mass surveillance. This move comes as the IJ challenges ALPR use on Fourth Amendment grounds in Norfolk, Virginia, and San Jose, California. The cancellations are a direct response to recent news coverage of ALPR misuse and the Supreme Court's ruling that cops need a warrant to access location data. The IJ's Plate Privacy Project aims to require a warrant for ALPR use, addressing concerns over privacy and surveillance.

IJ Publishes Database of 93 Cities Ending ALPR Contracts — theregister

Key Points

1

IJ's database tracks 93 local governments terminating ALPR contracts, citing privacy concerns.

2

IJ is challenging ALPR use in Norfolk, Virginia, and San Jose, California, on Fourth Amendment grounds.

3

IJ's previous database documented 15 incidents of police abuse of ALPRs, including romantic stalking and wrongful detentions.

4

The rate of cancellations and public protest has increased over the past few months due to more news attention.

5

US Senator Josh Hawley (R-MO) announced an investigation into Flock's data collection practices, raising federal concerns.

Why It Matters

If you're concerned about privacy and surveillance, the cancellation of ALPR contracts by 93 cities is a significant step. The IJ's litigation and Plate Privacy Project aim to require a warrant for ALPR use, addressing concerns over privacy and surveillance. The federal government's investigation into Flock's data collection practices further underscores the growing unease with warrantless mass surveillance.

privacysurveillanceALPRIJFourth Amendment

Frequently Asked Questions

Why does this matter?

If you're concerned about privacy and surveillance, the cancellation of ALPR contracts by 93 cities is a significant step. The IJ's litigation and Plate Privacy Project aim to require a warrant for ALPR use, addressing concerns over privacy and surveillance. The federal government's investigation into Flock's data collection practices further underscores the growing unease with warrantless mass surveillance.

What happened?

The Institute for Justice (IJ) released a database showing 93 cities terminating contracts for automated license plate readers (ALPRs), citing privacy concerns and misuse. The rate of cancellations has surged due to increased public awareness and legal challenges.

Comments

Subscribe to join the conversation...

Be the first to comment

Enjoyed this article?

Get it daily. 7am. Free. Reads in 5 minutes.

Join 3,337 builders reading daily.

Also get