💻Jenson: Desktop UX Stagnation Debated at Talk
Desktop UX: Are We Stuck in the Past?
TL;DR
Scott Jenson questions the lack of innovation in desktop OS design, arguing that while companies try new ideas, they remain extremely conservative. Jenson's talk challenges the status quo, highlighting the need for better window management and file handling.
Scott Jenson's talk at the recent conference questioned the stagnation of desktop user experience, arguing that Apple and Microsoft are not innovating enough in the space. Jenson pointed out that the current desktop UX is a workaround for outdated hardware issues. He emphasized the need for better window management in a multi-monitor setup, where the OS fails to recognize which monitor is for static content and which for primary work. Jenson also discussed the concept of a weak filesystem, where notes and texts live in application-specific databases, and the long-standing issue of files not coming out of the computer. The talk highlights the need for a more dynamic and user-friendly desktop UX.
Key Points
Scott Jenson's talk at the conference challenged the status quo of desktop UX, arguing for more innovation in window management and file handling.
Jenson discussed the concept of a weak filesystem, where notes and texts live in application-specific databases, highlighting the need for better file handling.
The talk pointed out the long-standing issue of files not coming out of the computer, a problem recognized since the 1980s.
Jenson emphasized the need for better window management in a multi-monitor setup, where the OS fails to recognize which monitor is for static content and which for primary work.
The speaker discussed the design of 'Rooms' in 1986, which aimed to reduce space contention in a window-based graphical user interface.
Why It Matters
Scott Jenson's talk challenges the status quo of desktop UX, highlighting the need for better window management and file handling. For developers using multiple monitors, the lack of OS recognition for different monitor roles can be frustrating. The concept of a weak filesystem, where notes and texts live in application-specific databases, could be a perk for some, but it also raises concerns about file management and accessibility.
Comments
Be the first to comment
Enjoyed this article?
Get it daily. 7am. Free. Reads in 5 minutes.
Join 3,564 builders reading daily.