Skip to content
WIRED·

📚Shy Girl Accused of 78% AI Text as Authors Push Detection Tools

Your manuscript could be flagged as AI tomorrow

TL;DR

A horror novel called Shy Girl was flagged by Pangram as 78% AI-generated, and its author denies it. The Authors Guild says writers should know process-tracking tools exist as a safety net, but warns that detectors are shaky and false flags are happening.

A horror novel called Shy Girl got accused of being mostly written by AI. Pangram, an AI detection tool, says 78% of its text is machine-generated. The author denies using AI at all, and several other fiction writers have faced similar accusations. If you write fiction, or you publish it, this is your problem now. Detection tools are being treated as verdicts, and the Authors Guild says people are seeing their own human-written pages come back flagged as AI. The catch? Pangram claims a 0.01% false positive rate on creative writing, which sounds great until you're the one in the 0.01%. The Authors Guild points writers toward process-tracking software. These tools record and document how a manuscript was written, encrypting and fingerprinting the work along the way. The Guild doesn't recommend any single product. Spoiler: no tracker is foolproof, and the AI arms race means every fix invites a new workaround. Worth watching: these tracking tools may be built more around copyright protection than proof of human authorship. That's a different job, and writers should know which one they're buying.

Shy Girl Accused of 78% AI Text as Authors Push Detection Tools — WIRED

Key Points

1

Pangram scored the horror novel Shy Girl at 78% AI-generated text, a figure the author disputes entirely and says is wrong.

Keep reading — it's free

Enter your email to keep reading — plus the best of AI & tech, daily. Free, forever.

Also get
or

Already a member? Sign in

AI detectionPangramcopyrightAuthors GuildAnthropic settlement

Comments

Subscribe to join the conversation...

Be the first to comment